Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial branded ‘total failure’ of justice system

After a two-month court hearing, Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial has been branded a “total failure” of the justice system.

Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial has been branded a “total failure” of the justice system.

The 55-year-old rapper said nothing as his mixed verdict was read on Wednesday (0.07.25) after spending nearly a year behind bars before he heard a jury acquit him of racketeering and sex trafficking charges that could have resulted in a life sentence.

Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani, president of Los Angeles-based West Coast Trial Lawyers, and who has been following the case since the beginning spoke to The U.S. Sun about the outcome.

He said: “Today’s verdict is nothing less than a complete and total failure by the prosecution in what will go down as the most expensive prostitution trial in American history.”

The trial, held at a Manhattan federal courtroom, concluded on Wednesday with Combs — known professionally as Diddy — found guilty of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution.

Each count carries a potential maximum sentence of 10 years, with no mandatory minimum.

The charges stemmed from a September 2024 arrest, after which Combs was denied bail multiple times and has remained in custody at Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Center.

Rahmani, 45, president of Los Angeles-based West Coast Trial Lawyers and a former federal prosecutor, also told The U.S. Sun: “Even though the Mann Act carries a potential 10-year maximum sentence, Diddy is going to get time served or close to it. His sentencing guideline range may be as low as 15–21 months.” He added: “The jury has spoken and prosecutors in the prestigious Southern District of New York should take this very embarrassing loss and move on.”

In a letter obtained by The U.S. Sun, prosecutors wrote to Judge Arun Subramanian following the verdict, noting a preliminary sentencing range of 51 to 63 months.

They added “the Government has not had adequate time to carefully consider all potentially applicable Guidelines provisions.”

Rahmani said the prosecution failed to secure cooperation from Combs’ inner circle, including figures identified only as KK and D-ROC, and called the sex trafficking charges “weak,” citing jury exposure to “evidence of consent.”

John Day, a 49-year-old criminal defence attorney based in New Mexico, also criticised the case.

“They presented a tsunami of evidence against Diddy over many weeks, and the jurors did not buy their story,” he told The U.S. Sun.

He added: “The government was trying to convince the jury that RICO — which was designed to go after the Mafia and mob organised crime families — should be applied to baby oil and Diddy’s high-flying lifestyle in the music business, and the jury just was not convinced.”

John added: “In retrospect, the prosecutors aimed too high with the RICO charges. He’s likely to get some time in federal prison — maybe more than three or five years, but not the full 20 years he’s facing after convictions on the two counts.”

Rosie O’Donnell, 62, was among the celebrities expressing anger after the verdict.

In a post on Instagram, she said: “I guess a jury just never wants to believe that a woman stays because of power and coercion – wow – they just think women stay because what? Money – fame – ‘they love the abuse’ – what a f****** joke – this decision got me angry #cassie.”

Prosecutors did not call any of the civil plaintiffs who have filed lawsuits against Combs but did not have direct relationships with him. Witnesses who testified included former girlfriends and employees.

One such witness, referred to as Jane, testified under an alias.

Combs’ legal team, in a letter to Judge Subramanian, argued he is not a flight risk and has been a model inmate.

“Reasonable conditions would ensure he would not have the ability to arrange to meet with escorts in the future,” the letter stated.

The defence further asserted “the jury unambiguously rejected the government’s allegations that Mr Combs ran a years-long criminal enterprise or engaged in sex trafficking – the core of the government’s case.”